1 00:00:01,060 --> 00:00:03,270 Alright, I’m Ben McLeish and as Harvey Milk would say, 2 00:00:03,420 --> 00:00:06,180 "I'm here to change your mind." 3 00:00:08,240 --> 00:00:12,260 Who here... hands up whoever, at this point, can understand and agrees 4 00:00:12,400 --> 00:00:14,750 with what our movement is about 5 00:00:14,900 --> 00:00:18,050 and who would describe themselves as on board? 6 00:00:19,540 --> 00:00:22,860 It's the guys who came a long way, isn't it? 7 00:00:23,000 --> 00:00:27,400 Who would say that maybe in principle they understand the ideas, 8 00:00:27,540 --> 00:00:30,210 they understand the logic behind it, but maybe 9 00:00:30,350 --> 00:00:32,400 they have some questions and they are not quite sure... 10 00:00:32,550 --> 00:00:35,910 There's a kind of a nagging feeling. They're not quite there yet. 11 00:00:36,200 --> 00:00:39,280 That's good; that's healthy. 12 00:00:39,440 --> 00:00:43,150 And who here thinks it's an Utopianist cult 13 00:00:43,300 --> 00:00:46,480 with plans for world domination? 14 00:00:47,690 --> 00:00:52,085 We kind of covered that one already, but yeah, it's not that. 15 00:00:52,890 --> 00:00:55,890 Here are some common objections and responses to a Resource-Based Economy. 16 00:00:56,030 --> 00:00:59,320 First off, it’s not a Utopia, 17 00:00:59,470 --> 00:01:02,220 as Tom said. There's no such things as Utopia. 18 00:01:02,360 --> 00:01:05,440 We aren’t under the illusion that we can create a perfect world. 19 00:01:05,570 --> 00:01:08,380 There is no such thing as “perfect” in a practical world. 20 00:01:08,520 --> 00:01:13,340 What we are proposing, however, is a whole lot better than what we have now. 21 00:01:13,490 --> 00:01:16,720 There will always be problems, but a global, emergent system 22 00:01:16,860 --> 00:01:20,350 where innovation, change and development is put center-stage, 23 00:01:20,490 --> 00:01:23,220 rather than being hamstrung by the profit mechanisms 24 00:01:23,360 --> 00:01:26,410 and interests of established power structures of any kind, 25 00:01:26,560 --> 00:01:29,050 is going to be more able to meet and solve these problems 26 00:01:29,200 --> 00:01:33,370 than our current so-called “established” societies. 27 00:01:34,890 --> 00:01:37,280 This is not communism, or socialism 28 00:01:37,420 --> 00:01:39,350 or any of the "isms" out there. 29 00:01:39,480 --> 00:01:41,670 Quite apart from the fact that no two people here 30 00:01:41,800 --> 00:01:43,830 will agree what "communism" is, 31 00:01:43,960 --> 00:01:47,340 since it is a high order abstraction with no real life referents, 32 00:01:47,480 --> 00:01:50,240 and with multiple, varied, real-world “versions,” 33 00:01:50,390 --> 00:01:53,190 even the most boiled-down version of Karl Marx's philosophy 34 00:01:53,340 --> 00:01:56,000 was still based on money, differential advantage, 35 00:01:56,130 --> 00:01:59,620 profit, earnings, various degrees of qualities of life and thus, 36 00:01:59,770 --> 00:02:03,510 social stratification was built into its foundations. 37 00:02:03,650 --> 00:02:06,600 Communism also pre-supposes property. 38 00:02:06,750 --> 00:02:09,600 Property, if you remember, is an outgrowth of scarcity. 39 00:02:09,740 --> 00:02:11,740 Because there may not be enough to go round, 40 00:02:11,870 --> 00:02:14,860 you need to “own” things to deter their use by others, 41 00:02:15,010 --> 00:02:17,760 to reserve, essentially, or guarantee 42 00:02:17,890 --> 00:02:21,610 the things you need and are now conditioned to want. 43 00:02:23,320 --> 00:02:25,590 Communism also didn’t have access 44 00:02:25,730 --> 00:02:28,350 to the technologies to create abundance, 45 00:02:28,500 --> 00:02:32,080 or certainly didn't envision or strive for a world of deliberate abundance, 46 00:02:32,230 --> 00:02:34,760 and didn’t imagine a world where all labor was automated, 47 00:02:34,900 --> 00:02:37,100 all necessities were supplied free of charge, 48 00:02:37,250 --> 00:02:40,701 and where the structure of society is a global, integrated system. 49 00:02:40,860 --> 00:02:43,970 Marx never considered a global economy based on resources. 50 00:02:44,110 --> 00:02:47,770 It's just a monetary system with slightly more or less government control 51 00:02:47,910 --> 00:02:51,000 coupled with varying degrees of romanticism of labor 52 00:02:51,140 --> 00:02:55,080 or the labor class, which ironically, they then want to get rid of. 53 00:02:55,220 --> 00:02:58,010 The fundamentals are the same as any other monetary system. 54 00:02:58,150 --> 00:03:00,460 What we propose and advocate lies outside 55 00:03:00,610 --> 00:03:03,410 the logical referent of this box of monetary-ism. 56 00:03:03,570 --> 00:03:07,500 The box itself, we feel, is structurally unsound. 57 00:03:08,030 --> 00:03:11,420 "Well, if it’s not communism, it sounds like a commune!" 58 00:03:11,560 --> 00:03:14,280 Well, again, a commune is defined 59 00:03:14,420 --> 00:03:18,620 by the deliberate artificial separation that we are trying to get past. 60 00:03:18,770 --> 00:03:23,150 We cannot simply separate ourselves from society and build a Resource-Based Economy. 61 00:03:23,300 --> 00:03:26,850 The logic of living according to planetary resources and total efficiency 62 00:03:27,000 --> 00:03:30,210 cannot be anything other than a global, all-encompassing operation: 63 00:03:30,360 --> 00:03:31,890 one system. 64 00:03:32,020 --> 00:03:33,960 The logic of efficiency demands it; 65 00:03:34,090 --> 00:03:36,850 multiple societies attempting to operate separately 66 00:03:37,000 --> 00:03:40,440 would require duplication of effort, resources and waste, 67 00:03:40,580 --> 00:03:42,270 as we see in the current system. 68 00:03:42,420 --> 00:03:45,390 It would also create competition, which would ultimately create war, 69 00:03:45,540 --> 00:03:49,000 as we fight for resources, space and so on. 70 00:03:50,360 --> 00:03:52,580 And you know what else? Everything that divides us 71 00:03:52,730 --> 00:03:57,030 whether be race, religion, or national identity, 72 00:03:57,180 --> 00:04:00,230 political affiliations, social classes, are false divisions 73 00:04:00,380 --> 00:04:03,460 invented or promoted by our respective societies 74 00:04:03,600 --> 00:04:06,470 to get you to buy in and not defect from 75 00:04:06,620 --> 00:04:09,030 that country or society you happen to be in. 76 00:04:09,160 --> 00:04:11,360 Why? It's about maintaining a group economy. 77 00:04:11,490 --> 00:04:14,910 Stability in the face of scarcity, real or artificial. 78 00:04:15,070 --> 00:04:18,960 Even geographic boundaries, which are at least based in spatial reality, 79 00:04:19,120 --> 00:04:23,280 are fading fast as we improve transport technologies. 80 00:04:23,580 --> 00:04:28,000 We are, and always have been, one global human race. 81 00:04:29,840 --> 00:04:32,390 We must live as such to ensure our survival 82 00:04:32,530 --> 00:04:35,010 at the maximum quality of life possible. 83 00:04:35,150 --> 00:04:38,660 Climbing into a forest, shedding all the benefits of technology 84 00:04:38,810 --> 00:04:43,190 and its advances, and reviving esoteric English witchcraft religions 85 00:04:43,330 --> 00:04:46,510 isn't going to do anything except devolve us, and only temporarily, 86 00:04:46,640 --> 00:04:49,510 before necessity forces that separatist society back into 87 00:04:49,660 --> 00:04:52,810 long-term contact with other human civilizations. 88 00:04:52,930 --> 00:04:55,000 There really isn’t anywhere left in the world for people 89 00:04:55,140 --> 00:04:57,510 to be able to do that anyway. 90 00:04:57,660 --> 00:05:01,300 Life on this planet tends towards complexity and sophistication. 91 00:05:01,450 --> 00:05:05,170 Communes are artificial, isolated, unsustainable and achieve nothing 92 00:05:05,320 --> 00:05:09,200 but to stave off large-scale social interactions for brief periods, 93 00:05:09,340 --> 00:05:14,290 mostly due to protest or divisionary beliefs based on inherited notions. 94 00:05:15,570 --> 00:05:17,590 Perhaps you think that competition 95 00:05:17,730 --> 00:05:19,860 would be a better ideology to base society on... 96 00:05:20,000 --> 00:05:24,090 That competition somehow speeds up innovation, makes pricing fair 97 00:05:24,240 --> 00:05:28,000 provides choice and so on, and it's generally a good thing. 98 00:05:28,140 --> 00:05:30,540 But the concept of the Resource-Based Economy 99 00:05:30,690 --> 00:05:33,010 is based on the same logic as the human body, 100 00:05:33,160 --> 00:05:35,090 as Jacque said on that video. 101 00:05:35,230 --> 00:05:37,810 Were your brain to decide tomorrow that it is the most important organ 102 00:05:37,960 --> 00:05:41,010 in the body, and demanded more of the resources, oxygen 103 00:05:41,110 --> 00:05:44,960 than the liver, or the left lung is more important than the right 104 00:05:45,110 --> 00:05:48,750 and demanded most of the resources itself, you'd rot away in a month. 105 00:05:49,040 --> 00:05:52,530 Animals live in harmony with their surroundings, not in competition with them. 106 00:05:52,680 --> 00:05:54,680 Nature has examples of competition within it, 107 00:05:54,800 --> 00:05:57,690 but in areas where food and resources are abundant for animals, 108 00:05:57,840 --> 00:06:01,240 you find they don’t fight over food. Nature is symbiotic. 109 00:06:01,380 --> 00:06:04,280 We must become symbiotic too. To be in competition 110 00:06:04,420 --> 00:06:07,170 with each other and attempting to “dominate” nature 111 00:06:07,310 --> 00:06:09,790 or each other, is to ensure our own demise. 112 00:06:09,920 --> 00:06:13,760 Nature, however, will carry on just fine without us. 113 00:06:14,610 --> 00:06:17,590 One I hear quite a lot of the time, and it's a fair question, is 114 00:06:17,730 --> 00:06:20,630 "What would I do in a Resource-Based Economy?" 115 00:06:20,780 --> 00:06:24,780 Where there's no traditional work or money, what would I do? 116 00:06:24,930 --> 00:06:27,930 It's a valid question, as we can only presume to imagine 117 00:06:28,080 --> 00:06:32,930 a massive void of inertia where once a 9 to 5 stood in its place. 118 00:06:33,100 --> 00:06:36,070 Oddly, I am actually asked this by friends of mine who work in the arts, 119 00:06:36,220 --> 00:06:39,590 or who have expensive, time-consuming or unusual hobbies. 120 00:06:39,740 --> 00:06:42,390 Or cab drivers who are amateur scientists. 121 00:06:42,530 --> 00:06:45,130 Why do you work in the arts? Why do you have hobbies? 122 00:06:45,270 --> 00:06:48,370 Why do you do favors for others? Why do you give to charity? 123 00:06:48,510 --> 00:06:51,900 Why did you come here tonight? Why do you do all of these things? 124 00:06:52,040 --> 00:06:54,240 You did all of these things absent the desire 125 00:06:54,380 --> 00:06:57,190 to make money, especially if you work in the arts. 126 00:06:57,500 --> 00:07:01,290 How much more could you do without the monetary restrictions you have now, 127 00:07:01,430 --> 00:07:04,300 and which you work in spite of? 128 00:07:04,700 --> 00:07:08,610 In low-power countries where people walk for hours to get water, 129 00:07:08,760 --> 00:07:11,960 one could imagine them thinking, "Well if I could just turn on a tap 130 00:07:12,110 --> 00:07:14,680 and get the water instantly and not spend 4 or 5 hours a day 131 00:07:14,820 --> 00:07:18,130 getting the water, what would I do with the spare time?" 132 00:07:18,290 --> 00:07:23,010 That's the same kind of logic that people can't seem to make that jump. 133 00:07:23,160 --> 00:07:25,820 It’s a little bit like being in a cell all of your life, 134 00:07:25,960 --> 00:07:27,760 a 5 by 5 foot cell. 135 00:07:27,900 --> 00:07:30,330 Offering a prisoner a way out of his cell, they then turn to you 136 00:07:30,460 --> 00:07:33,610 and say, “Well, what do I do now?” 137 00:07:34,710 --> 00:07:37,350 A related point: what about motivation to do anything 138 00:07:37,480 --> 00:07:40,170 if you aren’t essentially forced by economic pressures, as we are now? 139 00:07:40,320 --> 00:07:42,210 What will motivate us? 140 00:07:42,360 --> 00:07:45,210 Your motivation to recycle is not profit driven, in fact, 141 00:07:45,350 --> 00:07:47,870 it's quite the opposite; it costs you money and time, 142 00:07:48,020 --> 00:07:51,200 when you only factor in the drive to the bottle bank. 143 00:07:51,340 --> 00:07:54,670 Or Nikola Tesla... His motivation to create free energy 144 00:07:54,810 --> 00:07:57,080 the world over was certainly not profit-driven. 145 00:07:57,220 --> 00:07:59,980 In fact, JP Morgan, his backer, had to shut it down 146 00:08:00,120 --> 00:08:02,480 because of the impact it would have on the ability 147 00:08:02,630 --> 00:08:06,270 to profit from this. And what about this? 148 00:08:06,410 --> 00:08:09,900 The world has written a continually growing, emergent encyclopedia 149 00:08:10,040 --> 00:08:14,110 of 15 million articles in 272 languages in 9 years. 150 00:08:14,260 --> 00:08:16,650 Money has nothing to do with it, except for when they run out of it, 151 00:08:16,800 --> 00:08:20,700 periodically, and have to ask you for more, by those wonderful banner ads 152 00:08:20,840 --> 00:08:22,870 that we're subjected to. 153 00:08:23,010 --> 00:08:25,460 Imagine what Wikipedia would look like if they didn't have 154 00:08:25,610 --> 00:08:29,560 monetary restrictions to deal with; if money were literally no object. 155 00:08:29,710 --> 00:08:32,670 Imagine what the world would look like if money were no object. 156 00:08:32,820 --> 00:08:35,360 We already have the motivation, and it's more than money. 157 00:08:35,510 --> 00:08:40,100 What we are suggesting is a world where this is placed center-stage. 158 00:08:43,780 --> 00:08:47,830 Let's stick with the Wikipedia example. Who runs the societal infrastructure 159 00:08:47,970 --> 00:08:51,910 in a Resource-Based Economy? And could they take it over? 160 00:08:52,050 --> 00:08:54,060 Two big ones I get a lot, and they're valid questions as well, 161 00:08:54,200 --> 00:08:56,570 because people are worried about being dominated, although is quite ironic 162 00:08:56,720 --> 00:08:59,290 we live in this system now where we clearly are dominated, 163 00:08:59,430 --> 00:09:02,570 and we're kind of worried that we would be. 164 00:09:02,720 --> 00:09:05,640 I find that really bizarre, but it's okay. 165 00:09:05,780 --> 00:09:09,660 It feels a little cynical today to think that might be true. 166 00:09:09,810 --> 00:09:13,950 At its core, a Resource-Based Economy's systems, very much like Wikipedia, 167 00:09:14,090 --> 00:09:16,620 would need very few people to service any parts of the system 168 00:09:16,770 --> 00:09:19,240 that are not already self-repairing. 169 00:09:19,460 --> 00:09:21,960 Essentially, systems-maintenance. 170 00:09:22,110 --> 00:09:24,990 Are those people more powerful than those who live and thrive 171 00:09:25,130 --> 00:09:28,850 on the system without a direct linking to those kind of interfaces? 172 00:09:29,000 --> 00:09:31,580 Could they take it over? Well, are the individuals 173 00:09:31,710 --> 00:09:36,090 who run Wikipedia powerful? Could they "take over" Wikipedia? 174 00:09:36,260 --> 00:09:40,240 There's nothing to gain by attempting to own or control Wikipedia. 175 00:09:40,380 --> 00:09:44,070 It's a social system, run in spite of the profit mechanisms and power. 176 00:09:44,220 --> 00:09:48,330 What benefits us all, including those who maintain aspects of the infrastructure, 177 00:09:48,460 --> 00:09:51,200 would only hinder everyone, including those maintainers, 178 00:09:51,350 --> 00:09:53,180 were it compromised. 179 00:09:53,320 --> 00:09:57,360 The question of people “taking over” a society seems rather a moot point. 180 00:09:57,510 --> 00:10:00,990 Right now we live in the kind of society that can be taken over, and is 181 00:10:01,130 --> 00:10:03,030 regularly taken over by corporate interests, 182 00:10:03,180 --> 00:10:05,390 political powers and groups of wealthy people. 183 00:10:05,540 --> 00:10:08,740 It is this precise mechanism of dominance that is absent 184 00:10:08,880 --> 00:10:12,560 from a Resource-Based Economy in the same way it is absent from Wikipedia 185 00:10:12,720 --> 00:10:16,280 or any similar non-monetary resource. 186 00:10:16,950 --> 00:10:18,940 Here's a good one. 187 00:10:19,090 --> 00:10:22,540 Who makes the decisions in a Resource-Based Economy? 188 00:10:22,690 --> 00:10:24,840 This question actually needs to be rephrased. It’s not: "who makes 189 00:10:24,980 --> 00:10:28,440 the decisions", but “How are the decisions arrived at?” 190 00:10:28,590 --> 00:10:31,390 The running of society is a technical process. 191 00:10:31,550 --> 00:10:35,070 There are very few things that need to be “decided” by human opinion. 192 00:10:35,210 --> 00:10:38,190 Technical processes aren’t even decided by you now. 193 00:10:38,330 --> 00:10:41,350 Did you vote on the structural attributes of a bridge? 194 00:10:41,490 --> 00:10:44,940 Do you vote on which materials are used to construct houses? 195 00:10:45,090 --> 00:10:48,720 Do you vote on the internal mechanisms or designs of an MRI machine? 196 00:10:48,870 --> 00:10:52,490 No, because most of us, certainly me, don’t have the knowledge necessary 197 00:10:52,630 --> 00:10:54,730 to make large decisions like this. 198 00:10:54,860 --> 00:10:58,300 We already arrive at these decisions based on the best available information 199 00:10:58,440 --> 00:11:01,140 we have at the time. 200 00:11:02,610 --> 00:11:06,410 So what about, you know, lazy people? 201 00:11:06,590 --> 00:11:11,300 If I am busy in a contributory role, or not over-consuming, 202 00:11:11,590 --> 00:11:14,240 won’t others simply sit around, live off the fat of the land 203 00:11:14,380 --> 00:11:18,140 that the economy is now producing at no cost to the individual? 204 00:11:18,310 --> 00:11:21,780 First off, why is it that when people talk to me about lazy people, 205 00:11:21,930 --> 00:11:24,890 lazy people are always other people? 206 00:11:25,030 --> 00:11:27,050 I find that quite interesting. 207 00:11:27,200 --> 00:11:30,280 And if you do know a lazy person, when did they become lazy? 208 00:11:30,420 --> 00:11:34,440 Was it on their 20th birthday? Were they lazy as a child? 209 00:11:34,590 --> 00:11:38,340 Who here has toddlers who have chronic laziness? 210 00:11:38,490 --> 00:11:40,790 Who here remembers the day they became lazy? 211 00:11:40,930 --> 00:11:45,260 No, it happened over time, didn’t it? Slow, creeping laziness set in. 212 00:11:45,410 --> 00:11:47,980 You get home tired from work, you crack open a beer, 213 00:11:48,120 --> 00:11:51,390 you slam on the box and sink into the couch. 214 00:11:51,540 --> 00:11:54,740 Laziness is an effectual by-product of our society. 215 00:11:54,890 --> 00:11:58,510 Either we are spent from our jobs, demotivated by the treadmill lives 216 00:11:58,660 --> 00:12:01,410 so many of us are made to lead, conditioned by advertising 217 00:12:01,550 --> 00:12:04,540 to sit and consume, or by social inflexibility 218 00:12:04,690 --> 00:12:07,240 to be able to go out and do the things you want to do. 219 00:12:07,380 --> 00:12:09,960 In a world of far greater personal freedom, these tendencies 220 00:12:10,110 --> 00:12:12,400 towards laziness would drop off hugely. 221 00:12:12,550 --> 00:12:15,850 Even if they did not, a system of technologically-enabled abundance 222 00:12:15,990 --> 00:12:20,780 would not suffer from lazy behaviours the way it does presently. 223 00:12:20,910 --> 00:12:23,560 The Pixar film "WALL*E" imagined a world in which 224 00:12:23,710 --> 00:12:25,710 all the jobs had been replaced, 225 00:12:25,860 --> 00:12:29,180 but people were still hapless, over-indulgent consumers. 226 00:12:29,330 --> 00:12:32,420 Note that in the film they actually left the Earth to be massively inefficient 227 00:12:32,570 --> 00:12:34,810 and non-productive in space. 228 00:12:34,960 --> 00:12:36,860 The people had not changed in themselves, 229 00:12:37,000 --> 00:12:39,570 the society behavioral mechanisms had not changed. 230 00:12:39,720 --> 00:12:42,470 As technology does take over more and more of our jobs, 231 00:12:42,620 --> 00:12:45,460 so we must adapt to new tasks, and not simply 232 00:12:45,610 --> 00:12:48,480 to replace the old tasks with a complete void. 233 00:12:48,630 --> 00:12:50,520 It's a change that we are advocating. 234 00:12:50,670 --> 00:12:54,110 Coupled with the updating of technology is the updating of our behaviour; 235 00:12:54,250 --> 00:12:57,050 the abandoning of the over-consumptive, passive behaviors 236 00:12:57,190 --> 00:13:00,650 so excellently satirized by "WALL*E." 237 00:13:01,700 --> 00:13:04,740 So, if it's not lazy people, what about dangerous people? 238 00:13:04,920 --> 00:13:06,890 Bad people? 239 00:13:07,030 --> 00:13:09,450 Well, here's something you may not have heard before: there is no such thing 240 00:13:09,590 --> 00:13:12,000 as a bad or evil person, per se. 241 00:13:12,240 --> 00:13:14,540 Quite apart from the fact those two terms, bad and evil, 242 00:13:14,680 --> 00:13:17,580 are thoroughly empty terms that could mean anything. 243 00:13:17,730 --> 00:13:20,050 We are the products of our surroundings. People who commit crimes 244 00:13:20,200 --> 00:13:23,020 against the rest of humanity, whether it’s violence, theft 245 00:13:23,160 --> 00:13:25,620 corporate crime, are the products of a sick society 246 00:13:25,770 --> 00:13:30,330 whose mechanisms either encourage, necessitate or reward those actions. 247 00:13:30,470 --> 00:13:32,520 If you don’t believe this, why is it that some countries 248 00:13:32,660 --> 00:13:34,590 have much higher crime rates than others? 249 00:13:34,730 --> 00:13:38,150 Are there more “bad people” on that landmass? 250 00:13:38,490 --> 00:13:41,500 Surely if it's human nature were to blame, 251 00:13:41,640 --> 00:13:44,530 we’d have identical crime figures all across the world. 252 00:13:44,670 --> 00:13:47,110 We don’t because the situations, the environmental influences, 253 00:13:47,260 --> 00:13:49,260 are different in each location. 254 00:13:49,400 --> 00:13:51,470 Everything from the wealth gap, pollution levels 255 00:13:51,620 --> 00:13:53,510 positive or negative media influences 256 00:13:53,640 --> 00:13:56,740 right through to the weather, influences our behavior. 257 00:13:56,870 --> 00:13:59,920 It is the ultimate litmus test of society’s soundness. 258 00:14:00,060 --> 00:14:03,800 Higher crime rates are symptoms of the flaws of the system. 259 00:14:03,960 --> 00:14:06,280 Yet, right now we react to crime, not by looking 260 00:14:06,420 --> 00:14:10,040 at the aberrant behavior as a symptom of our social mechanisms, 261 00:14:10,180 --> 00:14:12,340 but by blaming the individual and locking them up, 262 00:14:12,480 --> 00:14:15,540 creating more laws and ultimately creating a less flexible 263 00:14:15,690 --> 00:14:19,940 and more oppressive society, which then, in turn, feeds the crime rate. 264 00:14:20,090 --> 00:14:22,070 In turn, the oppressive illiberal society produces 265 00:14:22,210 --> 00:14:24,190 more crime and a higher prison population. 266 00:14:24,340 --> 00:14:27,570 Criminals and ex-cons are precluded from successful lives after jail. 267 00:14:27,710 --> 00:14:30,010 No-one wants to employ a criminal. 268 00:14:30,140 --> 00:14:32,730 They also seem most likely not to have been given a decent education 269 00:14:32,870 --> 00:14:36,190 to begin with, or be able to get one afterwards. 270 00:14:36,360 --> 00:14:39,540 Violent crimes are more prevalent in societies with greater inequality. 271 00:14:39,680 --> 00:14:42,920 This slide comes from the Equality Trust who are just south of the river. 272 00:14:43,070 --> 00:14:46,370 It shows the clear correlation between inequality and homicides. 273 00:14:46,520 --> 00:14:48,780 Remove the underlying cause, inequality 274 00:14:48,930 --> 00:14:51,310 and the incidences of crime decrease as well. 275 00:14:51,450 --> 00:14:54,730 Stressed family environments, relationship breakdown, school shootings, 276 00:14:54,880 --> 00:14:57,290 gang violence, bank robberies, fraud; 277 00:14:57,440 --> 00:15:00,200 which of these cannot be traced back to social stratification 278 00:15:00,340 --> 00:15:02,980 based on income, greed or spending power, 279 00:15:03,130 --> 00:15:06,200 or the ability to gain differential advantage over others? 280 00:15:06,340 --> 00:15:09,260 If you remove the mechanisms that essentially encourage aberrant behavior 281 00:15:09,400 --> 00:15:13,430 and reward aberrant human interactions, the behaviors themselves will go away. 282 00:15:13,580 --> 00:15:17,903 As yet, we have not implemented a system which ever does this. 283 00:15:18,050 --> 00:15:21,980 Mental health issues, for the most part, stem from monetary issues as well. 284 00:15:22,120 --> 00:15:24,860 Mental illness can almost always be stemmed back to the environmental 285 00:15:25,000 --> 00:15:27,480 and economical societal inequality. 286 00:15:27,620 --> 00:15:31,000 This slide shows the correlation of mental illness with income inequality. 287 00:15:31,150 --> 00:15:33,470 It illustrates this point more than amply. Greater inequality 288 00:15:33,620 --> 00:15:36,750 facilitated by the narrow self-interest, the internal logic 289 00:15:36,890 --> 00:15:39,960 of a monetary system and the differential advantage and competition, 290 00:15:40,120 --> 00:15:43,330 directly negatively affects everyone in the population, 291 00:15:43,480 --> 00:15:45,700 including rich people. 292 00:15:45,850 --> 00:15:48,310 Based on 30 years of research by the Equality trust, 293 00:15:48,450 --> 00:15:52,060 if the UK were more equal, we'd be better off as a population. 294 00:15:52,210 --> 00:15:55,670 For example, the evidence suggests that if we halved inequality 295 00:15:55,830 --> 00:15:58,090 there would be: half the murder rates, 296 00:15:58,240 --> 00:16:01,470 mental illness would reduce by two thirds, obesity would halve, 297 00:16:01,620 --> 00:16:04,000 imprisonment would reduce by 80%, 298 00:16:04,140 --> 00:16:07,080 teen births would reduce by 80%, levels of trust 299 00:16:07,220 --> 00:16:09,280 would increase by 85%. 300 00:16:09,420 --> 00:16:11,430 Imagine how little crime there would be 301 00:16:11,570 --> 00:16:15,020 if we put true equality into practice in this country. 302 00:16:15,190 --> 00:16:18,180 And were there a global equality and partnership, can you imagine 303 00:16:18,320 --> 00:16:21,438 how quickly war would disappear? 304 00:16:21,680 --> 00:16:24,330 So what about the law? 305 00:16:24,550 --> 00:16:27,150 Legal restrictions are present in our society to limit problems 306 00:16:27,300 --> 00:16:31,150 that we've not been able to solve through technological means. 307 00:16:31,300 --> 00:16:34,880 We have drink-driving laws because our cars will crash 308 00:16:35,020 --> 00:16:37,300 if we’re drunk behind the wheel. 309 00:16:37,450 --> 00:16:40,500 But if we build cars that can’t crash into each other 310 00:16:40,640 --> 00:16:43,040 via GPS guidance systems, and with pendulums 311 00:16:43,180 --> 00:16:45,340 built into the base that correct a swerving motion, 312 00:16:45,490 --> 00:16:48,150 drink driving laws become irrelevant. You can get really hammered 313 00:16:48,280 --> 00:16:50,450 go out and drive. 314 00:16:50,600 --> 00:16:53,250 It is technologically more than possible. We already 315 00:16:53,400 --> 00:16:56,400 fly to the moon by remote control. 316 00:16:56,690 --> 00:17:00,170 But we don't do it because it is “too expensive.” 317 00:17:00,310 --> 00:17:03,510 A society structured around resources, equality and efficiency will mean 318 00:17:03,660 --> 00:17:07,130 the automatic redundancy of laws pertaining to finance and money, 319 00:17:07,280 --> 00:17:10,310 property, crime and socially offensive behaviors. 320 00:17:10,460 --> 00:17:14,060 Having a lot of laws is not the sign of a well-adjusted society. 321 00:17:14,200 --> 00:17:17,280 It is a demonstration of the flaws that society has. 322 00:17:17,430 --> 00:17:19,640 Laws attempt to patch up the inabilities 323 00:17:19,780 --> 00:17:23,500 to function correctly within that society. 324 00:17:24,110 --> 00:17:27,850 Perhaps... And you're not going to like this one. 325 00:17:28,070 --> 00:17:31,830 Perhaps you think that we can solve our problems with politics. 326 00:17:33,420 --> 00:17:36,680 We are not a political movement. We will not stand for election 327 00:17:36,820 --> 00:17:41,000 in both senses of that, I'm afraid. Why is that? 328 00:17:41,150 --> 00:17:45,320 Michael Ruppert said it best when he said that politics is economics by other means. 329 00:17:45,460 --> 00:17:49,120 Politics is simply another power outgrowth. To be elected, 330 00:17:49,270 --> 00:17:53,930 or even run for election, requires a large amount of money to canvas support. 331 00:17:54,150 --> 00:17:56,970 Once you are beholden to large corporate donors, 332 00:17:57,110 --> 00:18:01,060 it is literally impossible to fulfill real change in a society, 333 00:18:01,200 --> 00:18:04,390 since the wishes of your backers need to be fulfilled first. 334 00:18:04,540 --> 00:18:08,240 Those wishes are always to produce favorable laws and fiscal policies 335 00:18:08,390 --> 00:18:11,430 that will benefit those very donors and corporations, 336 00:18:11,570 --> 00:18:15,940 the promise of which was their sole reason for backing your party in the first place. 337 00:18:16,080 --> 00:18:20,300 Why do politicians break promises? Is it because they are “bad people”? 338 00:18:20,450 --> 00:18:22,270 No they aren't. 339 00:18:22,410 --> 00:18:24,690 Politicians are not here to change things. How could they be? 340 00:18:24,830 --> 00:18:26,850 They are raised, conditioned, promoted 341 00:18:27,000 --> 00:18:30,310 and admitted by the current established societal notions. 342 00:18:30,470 --> 00:18:32,580 They are not technical experts. 343 00:18:32,730 --> 00:18:35,590 How could they solve society's problems, which are technical? 344 00:18:35,730 --> 00:18:38,840 Most of them come from a legal background, which is semantic manipulation 345 00:18:39,000 --> 00:18:41,930 and nothing else. They aren't qualified to make changes. 346 00:18:42,080 --> 00:18:44,570 This man is an economist by trade. 347 00:18:44,720 --> 00:18:49,030 Given that he is absolutely indoctrinated into a monetary system, 348 00:18:49,180 --> 00:18:51,460 how is he going to bring about the change 349 00:18:51,610 --> 00:18:54,140 that he promises? The same is with every other politician. 350 00:18:54,290 --> 00:18:57,300 We cannot achieve lasting, real and meaningful change through politics. 351 00:18:57,450 --> 00:18:59,650 We need to move beyond politics. 352 00:18:59,790 --> 00:19:03,060 The simple fact is that politicians are not there to enact real change 353 00:19:03,210 --> 00:19:05,290 to the underlying root causes of society. 354 00:19:05,430 --> 00:19:08,570 Constrained by relatively short voting cycles and financial pressures, 355 00:19:08,720 --> 00:19:10,710 even the best, the most worthy and honest "leaders" 356 00:19:10,860 --> 00:19:13,040 have to operate within the system. 357 00:19:13,180 --> 00:19:15,620 It's time to take the next step in our social evolution. 358 00:19:15,770 --> 00:19:19,380 It is time to evolve along the only path that is relevant, 359 00:19:19,530 --> 00:19:23,450 one rooted in the real world, one that is truly possible. 360 00:19:23,600 --> 00:19:26,660 We have outgrown the needs for the mechanisms to manage scarcity. 361 00:19:26,800 --> 00:19:29,270 We have outgrown scarcity, itself. 362 00:19:29,420 --> 00:19:32,910 We have outgrown the need for war, poverty and profit at all cost. 363 00:19:33,050 --> 00:19:35,650 It's time to ditch the false divisionary notions based on belief, 364 00:19:35,800 --> 00:19:40,010 opinion, hearsay, surmise, and any and all inherited assumptions. 365 00:19:40,160 --> 00:19:43,970 Human beings are amazing. On this tiny pale blue dot 366 00:19:44,120 --> 00:19:47,640 we have come from the simplest of organic life, against all odds, 367 00:19:47,790 --> 00:19:50,570 to our present state of sophistication and consciousness. 368 00:19:50,710 --> 00:19:54,190 We have put to task our ingenuity and our creativity 369 00:19:54,340 --> 00:19:57,300 to produce astonishing results. 370 00:19:57,480 --> 00:20:00,350 It's only money now that is holding us back. 371 00:20:00,480 --> 00:20:03,700 We must not let our own failings to continue our evolution destroy 372 00:20:03,840 --> 00:20:07,260 the most valuable thing we have: ourselves. 373 00:20:07,430 --> 00:20:11,000 You don’t join us by voting for us. You don’t join us by canvassing for support. 374 00:20:11,140 --> 00:20:13,790 You don’t join us by signing up for a mailing list. 375 00:20:13,940 --> 00:20:17,230 And you don’t join us by buying a book, or a T-shirt, or a DVD. 376 00:20:17,370 --> 00:20:19,630 As mentioned before, any and all information we disseminate 377 00:20:19,770 --> 00:20:21,630 is offered completely free of charge. 378 00:20:21,780 --> 00:20:24,080 And you certainly don’t join us by giving us donations. 379 00:20:24,220 --> 00:20:27,510 We won’t accept them. You join us up here, in your head. 380 00:20:27,650 --> 00:20:31,400 You join us by realizing the logical limitations of our current lifestyle 381 00:20:31,550 --> 00:20:33,550 and calling for a new global model. 382 00:20:33,690 --> 00:20:36,040 We all join by breaking down the barriers 383 00:20:36,190 --> 00:20:39,430 we have imposed on ourselves or have imposed on us, 384 00:20:39,570 --> 00:20:41,640 to rejoin the other members of the human race 385 00:20:41,780 --> 00:20:43,850 waiting on every other side. Thank you. 386 00:20:44,010 --> 00:20:48,000 [applause]